Ordinary Days: Owen #2

 What is your name?

   “I-AM-WHO-I-AM”

     (Exodus 3:13-14)

Dear Owen,

I couldn’t help myself… I went ahead and read the first chapter of Comer’s “God has a Name.” The chapter tells the story of how it is that God reveals to Moses his name. I’ll stay here and wait for you to prompt me for chapter two. Meanwhile, maybe you will find the following summation of chapter one helpful.

God gives us, reveals to us, his name; but in the revelation, he remains hidden—a mystery: “I-AM-WHO-I-AM.” What kind of name is that? God tells us something about himself; yet we are not sure what. As Augustine puts it, God remains “hidden yet intimately present, steadfast yet elusive.” (Confessions Bk1,4,4)

 After trying to explain how it is that “I-AM-WHO-I-AM” gets turned into the “tetragrammaton” Y-H-W-H and how this tetragrammaton gets turned into “Yahweh” or “Jehovah” and why this is translated in our English Bibles as “LORD;” the writer pauses: “Whew…” Comer sighs, then asks us, his readers, “You still out there?” (p059) What do you think, Owen? Are you still out there?

At Corban University you get to read some theology. No matter how breezily Comer attempts to tell the story, it remains theologically demanding, doesn’t it? And yet, rewarding. So, let us stick with it and see where we end up, okay?

Love, Papa

Ordinary Days: Owen #1.

 

 Tell your children

    what happened that Day;

when you stood

    at the mountain. (Exodus 4:10)

Dear Owen, 

Hey… I got your golf team book: “God has a Name” by Mark Comer. This morning I read the Prologue (pp 1-37). It looks like a great read.

Which means, I owe you an apology. When you asked me if I knew the book, I said something flippant like, “Never heard of it.” Which was true. But in my heart, I was thinking: “I never heard of Mark Comer—can’t be that good.” I take it all back. It’s a great book. Comer gets us to the right mountain and from there only good things can flow. His breezy style of writing is a bit much for me, but so what, his breeziness gets us to the right place.

Let me know your plans for reading and I will follow along, okay? We will both learn something special about our God who gives us His name. Otherwise, how could we know?

Much love, Papa

Eastertide: Anna #28.

There is nothing new

    under the sun. (Ecclesiastes 1:9) 

Dear Anna,

I did my non-biblical devotions this morning from The Portable Renaissance Reader. It’s a collection of short reads from various Renaissance writers and troubadours. So, this morning’s short read came from Niccolô Machiavelli written in 1517—couldn’t help but think of you. It’s called “The Circle of Governments.” Let me send it your way. Maybe we can discuss around the morning fire when you get home, okay?

Machiavelli describes three possible forms of government (I suppose you know all this):

1.     Monarchical         becomes                      tyranny

2.     Aristocratic           degenerates into          oligarchy

3.     Democratic           lapses into                   licentiousness.

Then Machiavelli concludes: “I say, then, that all kinds of governments are defective; those three which we have qualified as good because they are too short-lived, and the three bad ones because of their inherent viciousness. Thus sagacious legislators, knowing the vices of each of these systems of government by themselves, have chosen one that should partake of all of them, judging that to be the most stable and solid. In fact, when there is combined under the same constitution a prince, a nobility, and the power of the people, then these three powers will watch and keep each other reciprocally in check.”

So that’s where we got our notion of checks and balances—written some 270 years before our nation’s Constitution. Now I’m finding out that Machiavelli was merely commenting on Aristotle’s Politics some 2,200 years before our Constitution. Maybe there really isn’t anything new under the sun, as Ecclesiastes keeps telling us. Our nation’s founders must have been classicists like you.

Love you, Papa

Eastertide: Anna #27

 

The Lord has

    made himself known. (Psalm 9:16)

Dear Anna,

Our next big Sunday is Pentecost—seven Sundays from Easter Sunday. Between Easter Sunday and Pentecost, our resurrected Lord, “showed himself alive”.  It is not as if Mary caught him walking down Main Street. It came at God’s choosing: “God raised him up on the third day and allowed him to appear…to us who were chosen by God as witnesses…” (Ac 10:40-41). Mary was the first “chosen by God as a witness.”

Between now and then, Jesus “showed himself alive” to Mary Magdalene first, then to the other women, then sporting with that couple walking home to Emmaus, then a few different times to his disciples while in Jerusalem, then later along the shore of Galilee where he fixed breakfast.  Maybe last, before he ascended, to his doubting brother James (1Cor 15:7). As our resurrected Lord ascends, the Holy Spirit descends making Jesus present for us though he can no longer be seen going before us. That is Pentecost—when the Holy Spirit descends making Jesus known to us.

Our knowing Jesus always comes from God’s side. It is not something we figured out; but rather, something given to us—the gift of faith.

Love,

PAPA

 

 

Eastertide: Anna #26

He appeared first to

   Mary Magdalene. (Mark 16:9)

Dear Anna,

Jesus chose Mary Magdalene to make his first resurrection appearance. Not only that, but the first to proclaim the Gospel—Mary, the first evangelist. Jesus’ second resurrection appearance will be something of the same when he chooses to make himself known to the other women—those who followed Jesus all the way from Galilee to the Cross, to the Tomb. They too, are commissioned by our Risen Savior to proclaim the good news: “Go and tell…” (Mt 28:10).

Pastor Heath Hardisty chose this Mary Magdalene story for his Easter message. He lingered on the part about how Mary saw Him, but thought he was the gardener, caring for the garden tomb of Jesus. Then pastor Heath mused about another garden, the Garden of Eden; from which we had been cast out onto the cursed ground; and, how our resurrected Lord takes us back, or maybe better said, “forward,” to a new Eden. It was a beautiful message. Wish you could have been with us.

Love, PAPA

Easter: Anna #25

 They saw that the stone

   had been rolled away. (Mark 16:4)

Dear Anna,

It happened early in the morning following Sabbath. A very ordinary day, when the women scurried to Jesus’ tomb, with their spices, to freshen things up; like we might bring flowers to the grave of a loved one. But when they arrived at the tomb, surprise! “The stone had been rolled away.” From that moment on, that ordinary day became “The Lord’s Day” (Rv 1:10).

“Easter Sunday” would come later. For the women with their spices, it was just an ordinary back to workday. It became a special day when the reality of our Risen Savior dawned on them. “Easter Sunday” is our invention. The Roman Church set the first Sunday after the first full moon after the vernal equinox, according to the West’s Gregorian calendar, as Easter Sunday. That’s why Easter jumps around. Our Pilgrim forbearers would have none of it. For them, Easter was too pagan—with its goddess name and strange calculations around the vernal equinox. They didn’t like Christmas either. For them, Sunday, “the Lord’s Day,” was enough.

It is okay for some to follow traditional days and others not: “Do not let anyone condemn you,” writes the Apostle Paul to the Colossian church, “in matters of food and drink or of observing festivals, new moons, or sabbaths. These are only a shadow, …but the reality is found in Christ” (Col 2:16–17). Our Christian faith does not require of us any dietary laws, or observance of special days or festivals. The Puritans were right about that. Nevertheless, I enjoy our Christian traditions of Christmas and Easter. We can’t have Winter without Christmas; and, we can’t have Spring without Easter; can we?

Easter reminds us that, every Sunday is a little Easter when the church gathers because “Jesus has risen” (Lk 24:6). That means that what happened on the Cross was God’s doing. On the Cross God was dealing with us and maybe even Himself. Easter Morning vindicates Good Friday.

Just musing, Papa

Good Friday: Anna #24

The sign was written in

   Aramaic, Latin and Greek. (John 19:20)

Dear Anna,

I woke up strangely spiritual this morning—desiring to go to church and participate in the Stations of the Cross. So, around the fire pit I read again the accounts of Good Friday. Strange name for the Day Christ was Crucified. What is so “good” about the Crucifixion of Christ?  It is what happened three days later, on Sunday morning, that makes Good Friday, good. Easter will be God’s big “Yes” to Calvary and to you and me—to humanity. Easter morning makes the Cross good news—Gospel.

Pilate fastened a notice to the Cross stating “Jesus of Nazareth, the King of the Jews.” He had it “written in Aramaic, Latin and Greek” (Jn 18:19-20). I can’t read “Latin and Greek” without thinking of you. Does it not speak of the Cross as an event meant for all people?

The sign sparks protest: “Do not write ‘The King of the Jews,’ but that this man claimed to be king of Jews” (Jn 19:21). The political turmoil has to do with who is our king. The Jews cried out to Pilate: “We have no king of Caesar!” (Jn 18:15) When we opt for other kings than Jesus, we end up subservient to Caesar. When, in faith, we accept the kingly rule of Christ in our life, we remain free from the Caesars of our world.

Just musing, PAPA